It is amazing how controversial the proposed trial relaxation of the mandatory bicycle helmet laws in Fremantle has been the last few days. When by Adele and I raised the issue after many months of discussion I don’t think either of us expected such a strong response to the issue.
Both the West Australian and the Fremantle Herald ran prominent stories and it also ran on all of the commercial news stations. Here is the West article:
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/newshome/13656583/fremantle-in-call-for-no-helmets-trial/
After wide examination of the evidence it seems to me that the benefits outweigh the costs. It is clear that more research would add clarity to this often divisive debate. A key advantage of having it as a trial in the geographically defined area of Freo is that it will also enable the State Government to collect more data and evidence on what are the best laws for balancing rider safety whilst increasing cycling numbers.
I would be interested to know what people think and whether a trial as outlined below would make you use your bike more in Fremantle?
For those wanting more detail this article is a good summary with references.
http://theconversation.edu.au/ditching-bike-helmets-laws-better-for-health-42

Here is our thinking in more detail too:
Trial Relaxation of the Mandatory Bicycle Helmet Laws
Building on the amendments the Northern Territory enacted in the 1990s it is proposed that there be a 2-5 year trial in the City of Fremantle based on the following principles:
1. bicycle helmet will be optional If you are over 18 years of age and cycling on a separated cycleway or mixed path
2. bicycle helmet will be optional If you are over 18 years of age and cycling on a road that is speed restricted to 50km/h or less
WHY?
More choice in low risk environments
The trial is based on the principle that adults on bicycles could be treated as such and should be given the choice to wear a bicycle helmet, particularly on low risk, low speed roads and on footpaths and cycleways. Australia and NZ (along with a few cities in Canada) are the only countries in the world that have mandatory bicycle use
Encourage more cycling
When helmet laws were introduced in 1991, cycling dropped by 40 per cent in Australia. It is interesting to note that the Northern Territory, where helmet rules are more relaxed, has a bicycle mode share of 4.2% compared to less than 2% nationally, while 31% of their bicycle users are women, compared to less than 20% nationally.
Safety in numbers
Northern Territory safety record shows they have paid no penalty for this amendment instead the NT has a lower injury rate of cyclists per head of population.
One of the most important safety issues for cycling is the number of people cycling. Numerous studies from around the world have shown a strong inverse relationship between the amount of people cycling and the risk of cycling. Put simple, by doubling the number of people cycling, cycling becomes 30% to 50% safer as fewer people are driving and motorists adapt their behaviour to the increased number of cyclists
Enables Bike Share Schemes
The public bicycle hire schemes in both Melbourne and Brisbane alternative recommendation not doing as well as similar schemes around the world One of the most common publicly raised concerns about the bike hire bikes is the requirement to wear a bicycle helmet.